Guide To Outsourced Chief Compliance Officer (CCO)

  • Post category:Guides

In today’s complex and rapidly evolving business landscape, regulatory compliance has become a critical aspect for organizations across industries. Adhering to various laws, regulations, and industry standards not only ensures legal compliance but also safeguards a company’s reputation and mitigates financial risks. However, maintaining an effective compliance program can be a daunting task, requiring significant resources, expertise, and constant monitoring.

This is where compliance officer outsourcing emerges as a viable solution for businesses. By partnering with external compliance experts, organizations can tap into specialized knowledge, experience, and dedicated resources to effectively manage their compliance obligations while focusing on their core operations. 

Compliance officer outsourcing

QUALIFICATIONS OF A CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER

The adviser’s CCO must adhere to the following:

  • Competent and aware of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”), as applicable to mutual funds;
  • In a position of sufficient seniority and influence within the business to compel others to abide by the compliance policies and processes. Fully responsible for developing and enforcing acceptable policies and procedures for the firm.

SERVICES PROVIDED BY A COMPLIANCE OFFICER

  • Conduct Reviews – Outsourced CCOs can perform both onsite and remote reviews of an organization’s compliance practices. This involves assessing various aspects of the compliance program, such as policies and procedures, training programs, internal controls, and risk management processes. By conducting thorough reviews, they identify potential gaps or areas for improvement.
  • Provide Compliance Services – Outsourced CCOs deliver a wide range of compliance services in accordance with SEC and/or state regulatory requirements. These services encompass areas such as regulatory filings, drafting and updating compliance manuals, monitoring employee trading activities, reviewing advertising and marketing materials, and maintaining compliance records.
  • Marketing Reviews – As part of their services, outsourced CCOs conduct marketing reviews to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. This involves assessing marketing materials, presentations, websites, and other promotional content to ensure they adhere to regulatory standards, accurately represent the organization’s products or services, and avoid misleading or false information.
  • Develop and Maintain Compliance Program – One of the key responsibilities of an outsourced CCO is to establish and maintain a robust compliance program. This includes developing and implementing policies and procedures that address regulatory requirements, conducting periodic risk assessments, providing compliance training to employees, and monitoring and reporting on compliance-related activities.
  • Perform Testing of Compliance Policies and Procedures – Outsourced CCOs are responsible for testing the effectiveness of an organization’s compliance policies and procedures. They conduct comprehensive testing to evaluate the implementation and adherence to these policies, identify any deficiencies, and recommend remedial actions to address them.
  • Complete Regulatory Filings – Compliance officers assist in preparing and submitting regulatory filings required by the SEC and/or state regulators. This includes Form ADV, Form PF, Form D, and other necessary disclosures and reports. They ensure that these filings are accurate, timely, and comply with all regulatory guidelines.
  • Provide Compliance Support – Outsourced CCOs offer valuable support during SEC and/or state examinations and other regulatory matters. They assist in preparing for examinations, coordinating with regulators, responding to inquiries, and addressing any compliance-related issues that may arise during the examination process. This ensures that the organization is well-prepared and can demonstrate compliance to regulatory authorities.

WHY DOES A FIRM NEED A COMPLIANCE PROGRAM?

There are numerous reasons a company might require a compliance program. The contemporary regulatory climate is among the most persuasive. Regulations influencing marketing, transparency, and other areas are always changing, so the company may need to stay up to date with them. Some of these restrictions include SEC regulations, state laws, and:

  • The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, passed in 2010, gives larger banks and financial institutions additional regulation. Large banks and some other financial institutions are required under these regulations to comply with stricter requirements for clarity and to have strategies in place in the event of an economic failure.
  • The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. US citizens must yearly report non-US accounts to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) under this 2010 law. This law mandates non-US banks and financial institutions to cooperate with the IRS in locating potential US citizens who may have open accounts and providing information on these people. Knowing what information the company may and cannot share will help them comply with IRS regulations and customer privacy expectations if the company has non-US accounts or operations abroad or if they provide financial services both domestically and in non-US nations.
  • The Investment Act of 1940. The current hedge fund, mutual fund, and exchange-traded fund (ETF) sectors are governed by the 1940 Investment Act passed by Congress. Congress mandates investment firm registration and controls the public market product offerings made by investment companies. The primary focus of the Investment Company Act of 1940 is the legal framework governing retail investment products.
  • The 1940 Investment Company Act. The present hedge fund, mutual fund, and exchange-traded fund (ETF) industries were all shaped by this 1940 rule. This legislation enacted by Congress controls the public market offers of investment companies and mandates the registration of investment companies.
  • Directive II on Markets in Financial Instruments. This 2014 EU regulation requires more openness and adherence to new reporting and operational guidelines for businesses providing investment services and activities. The company might need to stay informed about recent changes to this directive if they have activities in Europe.
  • Investment Advisory Services Act. The Investment Advisers Act, Rule 206(4)-7, which requires a written compliance policy, must be complied with by registered investment advisers (RIAs) and investment adviser representatives (IARs). A Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) must be appointed by RIAs and IARs to supervise the implementation of the established policies.

BENEFITS OF OUTSOURCING CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER

  • Focused and Dedicated Talent – Outsourcing the CCO role allows organizations to access a dedicated and specialized compliance professional or team. These experts possess in-depth knowledge and experience in compliance matters, enabling them to focus solely on ensuring regulatory adherence and managing compliance-related tasks effectively.
  • Untapped Knowledge – Outsourced CCOs bring a wealth of knowledge and best practices acquired through their experience working with various clients and industries. They can offer fresh perspectives, innovative solutions, and insights into emerging compliance trends, helping organizations stay ahead of regulatory changes and potential risks.
  • Reduced Cost – Hiring a full-time internal CCO can be expensive because it requires paying for their salary, benefits, training, and ongoing professional development. Due to the fact that CCOs are frequently hired on a contract basis, outsourcing the CCO position enables firms to access experienced compliance professionals at a fraction of the cost. Small and medium-sized businesses that might not have the resources to hire a full-time compliance officer can especially benefit from this cost-effectiveness.
  • Streamlined Access and Resources – Organizations can more easily access a variety of compliance resources, tools, and technologies by outsourcing the CCO position. A lot of established systems, procedures, and software are used by compliance service providers to assist with compliance tasks. This saves time and money by removing the need for businesses to purchase and maintain their own infrastructure.
  • Industry-Focused Outlook – Outsourced CCOs frequently specialize in particular sectors or industries. They can gain a thorough awareness of the particular regulatory requirements, dangers, and difficulties experienced by businesses operating in such industries due to their industry-focused perspective. They are able to offer specialized compliance strategies and solutions that are in line with rules and benchmarks particular to their industry.
  • Voice of Reason – The compliance function benefits from the independence and objectivity of outsourced CCOs. They are able to offer objective evaluations and suggestions that are free from personal prejudices or competing interests. Due to their objectivity, they are able to examine a company’s compliance procedures, spot flaws or potential improvement areas, and provide unbiased advice on reducing compliance risks.
  • Focused on Compliance and Nothing but Compliance – Organizations can make sure that compliance remains a key concern by outsourcing the CCO job. The entire focus of the outsourced CCO is compliance-related issues, allowing them to devote all of their time and experience to creating and implementing effective compliance programs, keeping track of regulatory changes, and quickly resolving compliance problems.
  • Meet/Exceed Expectations – Contractual obligations to meet or exceed certain performance standards and service level agreements are frequently placed on outsourced CCOs. The outsourced CCO is committed to providing high-quality compliance services, complying with legal obligations, and assisting the business in maintaining a robust compliance posture thanks to this contractual relationship.

DISADVANTAGES OF OUTSOURCING A COMPLIANCE OFFICER

  • Additional Scrutiny by Regulators – The compliance officer position being outsourced might attract more regulatory agencies’ attention. To make sure that all compliance responsibilities are being met, regulators may carefully analyze the relationship between the firm and the outsourced compliance provider. Consequently, firms may be subject to more scrutiny during regulatory inspections and may be asked to submit thorough records and proof of their compliance efforts.
  • Limited Communications with the Outsourced CCO – Since the outsourced compliance officer is not physically present within the organization, there may be limitations in terms of communication and availability. Timely access to the compliance officer and the ability to have face-to-face interactions may be restricted, which can impact the organization’s ability to address compliance concerns promptly and effectively.
  • Overall Regulatory Compliance Responsibilities Still Belong to the Organization – While the outsourced compliance officer can provide guidance and support, the ultimate responsibility for regulatory compliance lies with the organization itself. Outsourcing the compliance officer role does not absolve the organization from its obligations to comply with applicable laws and regulations. The organization must actively collaborate with the outsourced CCO and ensure that it remains actively involved in the compliance process.
  • Turnover within the Outsourced Firms – If the outsourced compliance firm experiences high turnover or changes in personnel, it can significantly impact the continuity and effectiveness of the compliance program. Loss of institutional knowledge, inconsistency in approaches, and delays in addressing compliance matters can occur when there is turnover within the outsourced firm. Organizations should carefully evaluate the stability and track record of the outsourced provider to minimize such risks.
  • Onsite Compliance Resource and Culture of Compliance – Having an onsite compliance resource or an in-house CCO can serve as a visible reminder for employees about regulatory requirements and the importance of maintaining a strong culture of compliance. A physical presence within the organization allows for more immediate and direct communication, training, and monitoring of compliance activities. Without an onsite compliance presence, organizations may need to make additional efforts to reinforce compliance expectations and foster a compliance-focused environment.

Reach out to us at Relin Consultants for further assistance.

FAQs

What is compliance officer outsourcing?

Compliance officer outsourcing refers to engaging an external service provider or firm to handle the responsibilities of a compliance officer within an organization. The outsourced compliance officer is responsible for ensuring regulatory compliance, developing and implementing compliance programs, conducting reviews, and providing expert guidance on compliance matters.

Why would an organization choose to outsource its compliance officer role?

Companies choose to outsource the position of compliance officer. They can use the dedicated compliance resources and technology provided by the outsourcing company, access specialized compliance expertise, save money when hiring a full-time in-house compliance officer, and have access to industry-specific information.

What are the typical services provided by an outsourced compliance officer?

Among the many services provided by outsourced compliance officers are developing compliance programs, performing compliance reviews and testing, keeping track of regulatory changes, helping with regulatory filings, offering advice on regulatory issues, running training sessions, and assisting organizations during regulatory inspections.

Is outsourcing the compliance officer role compliant with regulatory requirements?

It is possible to comply with regulatory standards by outsourcing the compliance officer position, but it is crucial to make sure that the selected outsourcing company has all the required qualifications and consistently complies with the law. Organizations should exercise due diligence, evaluate the track record of the outsourcing provider, and make sure that all regulatory requirements are stated and fulfilled.

How does communication work between the organization and the outsourced compliance officer?

Depending on the agreement between the organization and the outsourced compliance officer, different communication techniques may be used. Regular meetings, conference calls, email conversations, and safe document sharing systems can all be part of it. To ensure timely and efficient communication between the parties, it is important to create clear lines of communication.

What are the potential risks of outsourcing the compliance officer role?

Increased regulatory scrutiny, limited communication and availability, maintaining ultimate responsibility for compliance obligations, potential turnover within the outsourced firm impacting the compliance program, and the requirement for additional efforts to reinforce a compliance culture in the absence of an onsite compliance presence are risks connected with outsourcing the compliance officer role.

How should an organization select an outsourcing firm for compliance officer services?

Organizations should take into account a variety of aspects when choosing an outsourcing company, including the firm’s compliance knowledge and experience, understanding of the organization’s industry and legal requirements, track record and reputation, the services they provide, compliance technology capabilities, and ability to satisfy particular organizational needs.

Can an organization switch or terminate an outsourcing arrangement?

Yes, businesses often have the freedom to change or end an outsourcing contract. The termination, transition, and possible exit clause procedures should be described in the outsourcing agreement’s terms and conditions. When making such judgments, it is crucial to take into account any contractual duties, notification requirements, and data transfer restrictions.